Sensitivity of Chest Computed Tomography Scan in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: A Meta-analysis Study

Taha, Mohamed Shehata; Milad, MD, Peter; Abdelhamid Ahmed, Ahmed Nabil; Hamdy, Tarek Abdel Hamid

doi:10.21608/ejentas.2021.31891.1220

Sensitivity of Chest Computed Tomography Scan in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: A Meta-analysis Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Ain Shams University- Otolaryngology Department.

² Otolaryngology department, faculty of medicine, Ain shams university, Cairo, Egypt

³ Otolaryngology Department, Ain-Shams University

⁴ Otolaryngology Department- Faculty of Medicine- Ain Shams University.

10.21608/ejentas.2021.31891.1220

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is crucial for disease treatment and control. Compared to Real-time Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), chest computed tomography (CT) scan imaging may be a more practical and rapid method to diagnose and assess COVID-19, especially in the pandemic.
Aim of the study: To conduct a meta-analysis study regarding the sensitivity of chest CT scan in detecting Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Data sources: Using MEDLINE database (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Google Scholar and Scopus, we conducted a systematic search to identify relevant studies published within the last 6 months (from November 2019 till 20th of April 2020), appropriate articles were accessed in full text to determine eligibility and extract data by two reviewers.
Results: Fifteen retrospective studies were included, and their results were pooled in this meta-analysis. Chest CT scan showed positive finding in 2714 out of 3130 scanned patients. Sensitivity of the chest CT scan for diagnosis of COVID-19 could be extracted from all studies ranging from 0.61-0.99. There was considerable heterogeneity across studies. There was no evidence of publication bias.
Conclusion: Chest CT scan can provide a speedy and effective method to early recognize suspicious COVID-19 cases, contributing to reduction of cross infection due to its great sensitivity. But we should be cautious during interpreting these results since established available information about COVID-19 are rapidly evolving all over the world, in addition, most of the published information are incomplete.

Keywords