• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 26 (2025)
Volume Volume 25 (2024)
Volume Volume 24 (2023)
Volume Volume 23 (2022)
Issue Issue 23
Volume Volume 22 (2021)
Volume Volume 21 (2020)
Volume Volume 20 (2019)
Volume Volume 19 (2018)
BABU, H., SHARMA, R., SHARMA, V., GOYAL, R., RANA, A. (2022). Does FESS alter the sinonasal microbiome. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 23(23), 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.69458.1340
HELENA BABU; ROHIT SHARMA; VINIT KUMAR SHARMA; RAHUL GOYAL; AMIT KUMAR RANA. "Does FESS alter the sinonasal microbiome". Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 23, 23, 2022, 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.69458.1340
BABU, H., SHARMA, R., SHARMA, V., GOYAL, R., RANA, A. (2022). 'Does FESS alter the sinonasal microbiome', Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 23(23), pp. 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.69458.1340
BABU, H., SHARMA, R., SHARMA, V., GOYAL, R., RANA, A. Does FESS alter the sinonasal microbiome. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 2022; 23(23): 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.69458.1340

Does FESS alter the sinonasal microbiome

Article 45, Volume 23, Issue 23, 2022, Page 1-6  XML PDF (860.92 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.69458.1340
Cited by Scopus (1)
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
HELENA BABUorcid 1; ROHIT SHARMA email orcid 2; VINIT KUMAR SHARMA3; RAHUL GOYAL4; AMIT KUMAR RANAorcid 5
1Senior Resident ,Dept of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery,SRMSIMS,Bareilly,Uttar Pradesh,India
2HOD & Prof. ,Dept of Otorhinolaryngology ,Head and Neck Surgery,SRMSIMS ,Bareilly,Uttar Pradesh,India
3Prof,Dept of Otorhinolaryngology and head & Neck Surgery,SRMSIMS,Bareilly ,Uttar Pradesh,India
4HOD & Prof.,Dept of Microbiology,SRMSIMS ,Bareilly ,Uttar Pradesh ,India,
5Assistant Prof,Dept of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery ,Bareilly,Uttar Pradesh ,India
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common health problem.However few studies comparing pre and post-FESS microorganisms and efficacy of FESS are present.The present study aims to analyze the alteration in sinonasal microbiome in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Patients and Methods: The prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, SRMS IMS from November 2017 to April 2019 after the approval by the Research/Ethics Committee. All patients clinically diagnosed as Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) with and without Nasal Polyposis posted for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) formed the study group.Culture analysis of specimen from middle meatus region was done twice first, prior to FESS and second 6 weeks post-FESS.The changes in the microbiome were then analysed.
Results: In 31.4% patients methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus was cultured prior to FESS. Other organisms cultured were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas, Aspergillus, E.coli, Rhizopus and E.Faecalis. Post-FESS cultures were obtained at 6 weeks. Staphylococcus aureus was cultured in 77% cases. No fungal microbes or MRSA were cultured post operatively. In 11.4 % cultures no microorganisms were detected. No statistical correlation was observed between the diagnosis and organisms cultured.
Conclusion: The preoperative culture of MRSA and its absence in post-FESS cultures points to role in the pathogenesis of CRS. Fungal organisms Aspergillus and Rhizopus were cultured pre-operatively which were present in combination with bacteria supporting the co-infection theory. Effective role of FESS as surgical management is also consolidated.
Keywords
Biofilm; culture; MRSA; staphylococcus aureus; swab
Main Subjects
Otolaryngology including ear, nose and throat diseases
Statistics
Article View: 477
PDF Download: 396
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.