• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 26 (2025)
Volume Volume 25 (2024)
Volume Volume 24 (2023)
Volume Volume 23 (2022)
Issue Issue 23
Volume Volume 22 (2021)
Volume Volume 21 (2020)
Volume Volume 20 (2019)
Volume Volume 19 (2018)
El awady, M. (2022). Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty Through Endaural Approach. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 23(23), 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.141176.1519
mohamed Kamel El awady. "Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty Through Endaural Approach". Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 23, 23, 2022, 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.141176.1519
El awady, M. (2022). 'Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty Through Endaural Approach', Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 23(23), pp. 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.141176.1519
El awady, M. Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty Through Endaural Approach. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 2022; 23(23): 1-6. doi: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.141176.1519

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty Through Endaural Approach

Article 45, Volume 23, Issue 23, 2022, Page 1-6  XML PDF (312.35 K)
Document Type: Review article
DOI: 10.21608/ejentas.2022.141176.1519
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
mohamed Kamel El awady email
el moktm
Abstract
Introduction: Different approaches were used for myringoplasty mainly the post-auricular, the endaural and trans-canal
using either the endoscopic or the microscopic. This study aims to compare endoscopic myringoplasty with microscopic
myringoplasty through end aural approach using temporalis fascia graft regarding operative technique, success rate and
postoperative hearing improvement.
Patients and Methods: The work was performed at the ENT Department, Al-azhar University hospitals. The work
involved 40 cases diagnosed to have chronic suppurative otitis media of tubotympanic type submitted to myringoplasty
operation. They were classified into Class A: endoscopic myringoplasty and Class B: microscopic myringoplasty through
endaural approach.
Results: The graft was taken after 3 months in 18 cases (90%) in class A and in 17 cases (85%) in class B. The mean
of Preoperative airbone gab (ABG) was 22.85±10.34db in group A and the mean postoperative ABG was 5.5 ±2.15
db while the mean Preoperative ABG was 25.75±5.90 db in class B and the mean postoperative ABG was 7 ±3.25 db
with statistically significant difference between Preoperative and postoperative ABG (p value<0.05), also in class A, the
perforation circumference was definitely visible in whole cases (100%) without the necessity for external auditory canal
drilling or curettage, whereas in class B, it was only partially visible in 7 cases (35%).
Conclusion: Regardless of the perforation's width, the external auditory canal's narrowness, or its protrusion, an
endoscopic myringoplasty can be done. The best hope for ear surgery in the future is the endoscope.
Keywords
Endoscopic; microscopic; myringoplasty
Main Subjects
Otolaryngology including ear, nose and throat diseases
Statistics
Article View: 311
PDF Download: 418
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.